Bill to Regulate State’s Tanning Salons Passes Senate

Senate Bill 349, which would regulate the state’s tanning facilities and set age limits for who can use them, passed the state Senate by a vote of 48-1 on Oct. 31, 2011. The bill now goes to the House Health Committee for consideration. 

SB 349, which the Pennsylvania Medical Society (PAMED) supports, would prohibit children younger than 14 from using a tanning device without a letter from a physician. It would require parents to accompany 14- to 18-year-olds to the tanning facility and sign written permission each time they use a tanning device. The bill also would require tanning facilities to:

  • Have a license
  • Undergo inspections
  • Post signs warning of the hazards of ultraviolet rays
  • Have customers sign a warning statement
  • Report injuries to the state
  • Train operators of tanning beds 

Contact your state representative and ask for their support of this bill.

While the previous version of the bill died in the House during the last legislative session, it was reintroduced by Sen. Pat Browne (R-Lehigh).

Though there is a similar bill in the House (HB 369), PAMED believes SB 349 is more likely to be the ultimate vehicle for regulation tanning salons.

More than 10 years ago, Pennsylvania physicians first took up the fight to regulate tanning facilities. Since then, many states—including neighboring Maryland, Ohio, and New York—have regulated these facilities and established age restrictions. But Pennsylvania’s tanning facilities are still unregulated.

PAMED and the Pennsylvania Academy of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery believe that this proposed legislation is a good start to regulate indoor tanning facilities, although more work would need to be done to completely protect minors from the harmful effects of UV light.

Add Your Comments


The Pennsylvania Medical Society encourages lively debate, but please behave courteously and responsibly. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks (including language that could potentially identify an individual), or any other inappropriate, offensive, or illegal material will be removed. For more information, please see our Terms of Use. We do not answer legal questions on line. Members seeking general information about laws and regulations affecting medical practice may call our member resource line, (800) 228-7823.

Display name as (optional):

Comments (max 2000 characters):




Comments: 2


stay out of our Livrs ..... BIG GOVT

dalmatia at 11/30/2011 2:31:47 PM


I've seen the bad science that the majority of dermatologist hang their hat on. The alterior motive again is to drive more customers (patients) to them in order to line their pockets. As with the original bill to require a tax on Botox injections, that cosmetic surgeons successfully lobbied to transfer to tanning salons so too do the dermatologists and their well funded lobbiest now wish to affect onto the tanning industry. Let's start talking about the harmful effects that no, or not enough UV exposure can cause. Does anyone really ever just want to hear the truth? I am not a doctor, but I am educated. I'm also educated in medicine And most of the doctors that I have encountered are arrogant elitists with God Complexes. And it makes me laugh how all it takes is to have that "Dr." salutation or "MD" after your name for the masses to hang on their every word as if it were the gospel. Let me tell you something. Most of them don't really know all that much more than the next educated person. But they are smart enough to know how to manipulate the masses. Do your own research. Research based on good science. Not the research based upon the bad science that the media (also controlled by powerful lobbies)reports. I am all for responsible UV exposure. I have been in business for over nine years and have never seen any detrimental cases of over exposure to UV radiation. Please, lets just not mistake what they disguise as caring for fellow human beings with what they really intend to affect and that is more money in their pockets.

Geoff P. at 11/1/2011 9:18:56 PM

Last Updated: 2/29/2012
From: 
Email:  
To: 
Email:  
Subject: 
Message: