Pathology Disclosure Law Affects Billing

A new law effective Jan. 22, 2011, increases payment disclosure requirements for physicians who order laboratory tests and directly pay the lab for the tests. It was passed unanimously by the state Senate and House of Representatives.

The Pennsylvania Medical Society (PAMED) was able to have House Bill 2521 amended on the House floor so that it follows American Medical Association (AMA) and PAMED policy regarding pathology service disclosure. 

In Pennsylvania, physicians can either direct bill or client bill for pathology services.  With direct billing, the provider or entity that provided or supervised the lab service directly receives payment. 

With client billing, the physician who ordered the lab service pays for the service and then collects payment from the patient or insurer. This allows the physician to, for instance, charge full price for the laboratory service even if they received a discount.

AMA and PAMED policy calls for physicians who client bill to disclose the name of laboratory, the amount charged by the laboratory for each test, and the amount of the physician’s acquisitions or processing charge in bills to patients or insurers.

Similar disclosures are required in a number of states, including Delaware, Ohio, Maryland, and New Jersey.

Add Your Comments


The Pennsylvania Medical Society encourages lively debate, but please behave courteously and responsibly. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks (including language that could potentially identify an individual), or any other inappropriate, offensive, or illegal material will be removed. For more information, please see our Terms of Use. We do not answer legal questions on line. Members seeking general information about laws and regulations affecting medical practice may call our member resource line, (800) 228-7823.

Display name as (optional):

Comments (max 2000 characters):




Comments: 3


I disagree. In what other business must the retailer disclose their acquisition cost? Suppliers give me a discount for me to prefer them. If Philly Pathologist can get a discount to "resell" clinician services, he should. The key is choice -- my patient should be able to go to Quest directly and pay what Quest wants, or go to me and pay what I want. But Quest does not have to disclose their internal costs for a test, why should I?

Squeezed IM at 1/20/2011 1:21:52 PM


I agree - except I believe a stronger law is needed to close the in-office loophole allowing for certain specialties to perform in-office AP services. Disclosure helps but does very little. I wish CAP was more aggressive on the state level when it comes to this!

PATHMAN at 1/20/2011 12:26:04 PM


This bill is sorely needed. Consider the opposite (if it were possible): pathologists billing for clinician services and then paying them a lower rate! That would not be acceptable to clinicians. Neither is the reverse; time to stop in-office anatomic pathology services and its billing that favors the owners.

Philly Pathologist at 1/20/2011 12:08:25 PM

Last Updated: 1/14/2011
From: 
Email:  
To: 
Email:  
Subject: 
Message: